Facebook Linkedin X-twitter Youtube Rss
Contact Us
Office chairs in a row at a conference table

Listening Fatigue at Work: Why Hearing Loss Is Exhausting and What Employers Can Do

/ Hearing loss, Professionals / By

An employee with hearing loss can be doing everything asked of them in meetings, answering the phone and following the conversation, and still be running on empty by three o’clock. Their manager sees a capable colleague who has gone quiet in the afternoon, declined the after-work drinks and started to look worn out. What the manager does not see is the effort that went into every conversation before that point.

For occupational health and HR, this matters because tiredness of this kind rarely appears on a referral form. It shows up as short-term absence, a drop in confidence, a request to reduce hours or, in the worst cases, an experienced person deciding that work has become too hard to sustain. This article looks at what listening fatigue is, what the research does and does not show, and the practical changes that can reduce it. A hearing loss workplace assessment is one way of working out which of those changes suit a particular person and a particular job.

Office chairs in a row at a conference table

About listening fatigue

People with normal hearing recognise speech almost automatically. With hearing loss, the brain receives a degraded signal and has to fill the gaps using context, memory and attention. That is real mental work, and it is done on top of the actual job.

The research here is genuinely interesting, and also less settled than people often assume. Pichora-Fuller and colleagues published the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (known as FUEL) in the journal Ear and Hearing in 2016, following an expert workshop. It treats listening effort as the result of three things working together: how demanding the listening task is, how much mental capacity the person has available, and how motivated they are to keep trying. That last point is worth pausing on. Someone who cares about doing well at work may push through effort that someone less invested would abandon, which can make the cost less visible and the eventual fatigue greater.

In the same journal supplement, Hornsby, Naylor and Bess reviewed the evidence on fatigue and hearing loss. They concluded that some adults with hearing loss may be at increased risk of fatigue and low energy, most clearly the longer-term, self-reported kind. They also described the research as limited, with small samples, measures that often disagree with each other and no standardised way of measuring listening-related fatigue. Whether hearing aids reduce long-term fatigue, they said, still needed confirming.

Hornsby’s own 2013 study illustrates both the promise and the limits. Sixteen adults completed a 50 to 60 minute listening task at the end of the working day. Reaction times slowed over the session when they listened without hearing aids and stayed steady when they wore them. But the participants’ own ratings of fatigue got worse in every condition, and individual variation was large. A small 2025 pilot study of first-time hearing aid users did not find that fitting reduced listening-related fatigue, although its authors put that down to a very small sample and low starting fatigue scores. It is best read as a consistent signal with unresolved detail, not as settled fact.

How listening fatigue can affect work

The best-known occupational evidence comes from the Netherlands. Kramer and colleagues compared 150 hearing-impaired employees with 60 hearing colleagues in a study published in 2006, using data collected around 2000 and 2001. The hearing-impaired group reported much greater effort in hearing, more environmental noise and less control over their work. Seventy-seven per cent reported some sick leave in the previous period compared with 55 per cent of colleagues, and stress-related sick leave was reported by 26 per cent against 7 per cent. This is old, self-reported and drawn from a clinic population, so treat the figures as indicative.

More recent Dutch work points the same way on tiredness, with caveats. The Netherlands Longitudinal Study on Hearing, a large web-based cohort, found that working adults with poorer hearing needed more time to recover from work effort. A 2025 comparison in the International Journal of Audiology found a higher need for recovery in hearing-impaired adults than in those with normal hearing (50.7 per cent against 25.8 per cent on the measure used). That same study found no significant difference in sick leave between the groups, which does not confirm the earlier link. So the evidence on fatigue is fairly consistent, while the evidence on absence is mixed. It would be wrong to promise an employer that tackling listening fatigue will cut sickness absence by a given amount.

UK data are thinner. The RNID survey Working for Change, based on 1,072 people with hearing loss and fieldwork in late 2017, found that 79 per cent of those who had worked in the previous seven years had felt stressed at work because of their hearing loss. Of the 202 respondents who had retired early, 56 per cent said hearing loss was a factor, 41 per cent partly and 15 per cent fully. The survey did not ask about tiredness directly, so it cannot tell us how much of that stress and early exit was fatigue. RNID estimates that over 17 million people in the UK have some hearing loss, including around 9 million of working age, although it notes that these are estimates built on a 1995 study and probably understate the true figure.

No-cost and low-cost workplace adjustments

None of the adjustments below is proven in a trial to reduce listening fatigue specifically. They follow from the principles in the research (reduce the demand, protect the capacity) and from RNID and Acas guidance on accessible meetings and reasonable adjustments. They should be tested with the individual, not applied as a standard package.

Area Suggested adjustment Why it helps
Meeting structure Circulate an agenda in advance, keep to one speaker at a time and use a raise-hand routine. Knowing the topic and who is speaking lowers the guesswork that makes listening effortful.
Breaks Schedule a break in any meeting over an hour and avoid back-to-back meetings. Listening effort accumulates, and a proper pause gives the person time to recover rather than carry the load into the next conversation.
Acoustics and room choice Use smaller, quieter rooms with soft furnishings and good lighting, and test any hearing loop before the meeting. Less echo and background noise means a clearer signal and less work to decode it.
Background noise Offer a quieter desk or a quiet room for focused or demanding calls, and reduce noise in video meetings. Background noise competes with speech, and RNID recommends reducing it in both in-person and remote settings.
Captioning and text support Turn on captions in online meetings, and share notes or a written summary afterwards. Text takes pressure off listening. Automatic captions are not fully accurate, so colleagues should flag errors.
Scheduling Place the most demanding listening tasks earlier in the day where the person says that suits them. Some people find listening harder later in the day, so timing may matter, and the person is best placed to say.
Workload Review how many meetings and calls sit in a day and offer written alternatives to routine ones. Reducing the amount of live listening reduces the total effort demanded.
Working pattern Consider flexible hours, a phased return after absence or a hybrid mix that includes quieter days. Acas lists changes to hours and working arrangements as typical reasonable adjustments, and RNID lists flexible hours too.

What this means for occupational health, HR and case managers

The first point is about what to ask. A referral that asks only whether someone can hear in meetings will miss the cost of doing so. Better questions are how the person feels at the end of the day, what they do to recover, what they have stopped doing (social events, optional meetings, phone work) and whether anyone has noticed a change in their performance late in the day. Those answers describe function, which is what an employer can act on.

Second, be careful with causation in reports and case notes. Fatigue has many causes, and the research does not allow anyone to attribute it to hearing loss in an individual with confidence. Describing the listening demands of the job, the conditions they are carried out in and what the person reports is more defensible than stating a cause. The same applies to absence: the evidence is mixed, so recommendations are better framed around retention and sustainable working than around an expected reduction in sick days.

Third, look at the listening demands of the role as well as the person. Hours of live phone work, open-plan seating and long unstructured meetings are very different from desk-based work with written communication. A specialist, practical hearing loss workplace assessment can map those demands and suggest proportionate changes, alongside audiology, occupational health and rehabilitation input, never in place of them. Equipment helps many people but does not remove the effort, so support at work still matters.

Hints and tips for the individual

  • Say plainly which situations tire you most, such as long meetings, calls or noisy rooms, so your manager can plan around them.

  • Ask for the agenda and any papers in advance, and for a written summary of decisions afterwards.

  • Take real breaks away from your screen and from conversation, and put short recovery time between demanding meetings in your diary.

  • Choose the seat with the best view of the speaker and the least noise behind you.

  • Keep a short note of the times and tasks that leave you most drained. It gives you evidence for a conversation about adjustments.

  • Look after your wellbeing outside work too. Tiredness is not something to apologise for.

Building awareness and communication

Most of what reduces listening fatigue is ordinary good communication practice: face the listener, speak one at a time, keep your mouth visible, check understanding and do not talk over others. Colleagues who understand that a quiet afternoon may reflect hours of hard listening, not disinterest, tend to respond more kindly and more usefully.

Managers should also make asking easy. The Working for Change survey found that 18 per cent of respondents who had held back from telling their employer about their hearing loss did so because they feared losing their job. A direct and unpressured conversation about what helps, repeated occasionally because needs change, makes honest answers more likely.

Legal rights and support

Under the Equality Act 2010, a person is disabled where they have an impairment with a substantial and long-term adverse effect on their ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. Schedule 1 of the Act says an effect is long-term if it has lasted, or is likely to last, at least 12 months. It also says the effect of treatment and aids, including hearing aids, is ignored when deciding whether the effect is substantial, so a person who functions well with aids may still meet the definition. Where the definition is met, the employer has a duty to make reasonable adjustments. Acas notes that the employer is responsible for paying for reasonable adjustments, and that what is reasonable depends on factors such as practicality, cost and whether the change removes or reduces the disadvantage.

Access to Work can help with practical support at work, including equipment, support workers and communication support. It covers people who live and work in England, Scotland or Wales. Northern Ireland has a different system. Access to Work does not pay for adjustments the employer is legally required to make, but it can advise the employer on them.

Whether the definition is met for a particular person depends on their circumstances, and this article is general information rather than legal advice.

Summary

Listening fatigue is plausible, commonly reported and poorly measured. The evidence is stronger for people feeling tired and needing longer to recover than it is for any specific effect on absence, and no trial has yet shown which workplace changes reduce it. That is not a reason to wait. Agendas, breaks, quieter rooms, captions and a sensible look at meeting load cost little, and they can be tried and reviewed with the employee. A practical next step for an employer or referrer is to ask about the end of the day, not just the meeting room.

Watch the short film

This short film follows one person with hearing loss through a working day. By mid-morning they are working hard to follow the team meeting, and by the afternoon their energy has gone. Four changes helped: live captions, one person speaking at a time, notes shared before the meeting and proper breaks. The film lasts just over a minute.

Frequently Asked Questions

It is the tiredness that can follow sustained effort to understand speech, particularly when the signal is degraded by hearing loss or background noise. Researchers describe it as a plausible consequence of effortful listening, but it is not yet consistently measured.

The evidence is mixed. A 2006 Dutch study found more sick leave, especially stress-related, among hearing-impaired employees, while a 2025 Dutch comparison found no significant difference. The findings on need for recovery after work are more consistent.

Not reliably. Some studies suggest hearing aids reduce susceptibility to fatigue, but the review evidence says this needs confirming, and a small 2025 pilot found no reduction. Many people still need adjustments at work while using them.

They help many people, but RNID notes that automated captions are not fully accurate. Pairing them with an agenda, clear turn-taking and a written summary works better than relying on captions alone.

If you or someone in your team is deaf or has hearing loss and would like expert, tailored support to stay productive and comfortable at work, you can arrange a hearing loss workplace assessment with us.

Sources